Monday, December 17, 2012

China's Champions Face Growing Skepticism

Monday December 17, 2012 – Greg Scoblete

The rise of China is the one of the most discussed topics in geopolitics, but its rise is no less significant in the smaller corner of the network infrastructure world. And just as China's rise has ruffled the feathers of established powers like the U.S. and Japan, the growing global presence of Chinese telecommunications firms isn't sitting well with the West.

Two of China's telecom powerhouses, Huawei and ZTE, have run into trouble with U.S. and European regulators. Both firms make a raft of network and consumer products, including routers, switches, mobile phones and set-top boxes. In October, the U.S. House Intelligence Committee declared that both companies posed a security risk and advised U.S. companies to avoid doing business with them.

The fear is that the close collaboration between both ZTE and Huawei and the Chinese government could open up U.S. communications networks to spying. This may sound paranoid or reminiscent of Cold War-era distrust, but there's reason to be concerned. China is notorious for its industrial espionage and the linkages between ZTE and Huawei and China's ruling communist party are opaque. (To be fair, the U.S. is no slouch when it comes to the espionage game either).  

Questions regarding both firms have bubbled up in Europe as well, although there the concerns center around price-fixing. The executive arm of the European Union recently concluded that both ZTE and Huawei were guilty of dumping wireless infrastructure products into Europe at below-market prices to gain share and disadvantage European firms. A report in Forbes also noted that concerns have spread into markets typically friendly to Chinese firms, such as India (where a state agency recommended banning both firms) and Australia (which forbid Huawei from bidding on the building of a broadband network).

Competitors have been quick to pounce on the wounded firms. Cisco, for instance, wasted no time in bashing both firms publicly and cutting ties with ZTE.

Still, business marches on and neither company looks likely to be permanently derailed by their setbacks. ZTE recently gained access to Nagra's set-top box customers, giving them a broad spectrum of European cable customers to market to. Moreover, the firm's positions in IPTV middleware and set-top boxes is likely to strengthen as pay TV growth accelerates in Asian markets.

For its part, Huawei has just opened up an R&D facility in Helsinki (following a massive investment in the UK) and will be employing more Europeans in the coming year - facts which will surely weigh on the minds of European Union regulators as they plot next steps for dealing with the allegations of market manipulation.

Nonetheless, for both companies, close association with the Communist party may prove to be a liability if geopolitical tensions spill over into commercial considerations.

Monday, December 10, 2012

Where's My OLED HDTV?


Monday December 10, 2012 – Stewart Wolpin

For awhile, it seemed, we were free from 1980's-style vaporware from major equipment manufacturers.

Apparently not.

At last year's CES, Samsung and LG elbowed each other over "first-ever" recognition for their respective 55-inch, pencil-thin next-generation OLED HDTVs. Each company intimated, if not outright promised, we'd be knee-deep in OLED HDTVs before the end of this year.

For instance, LG was quoted in myriad publications as late as a month ago it's intention to start selling its 55EM9600 this year in Korea and maybe in Europe "by Christmas" for $10k.

Personally, I never believed the whole "OLED available in 2012" rhetoric. But it's disturbing that otherwise responsible entities forgot the vaporware lessons of the last century and promoted the whole "OLED available in 2012" possibility.

My cynicism was confirmed by reports that both Samsung and LG have delayed OLED production until next year.

For one thing, it's doubtful there's even a market for a $10k OLED HDTV with today's sets selling for less than a fifth of that figure.

Yes, the picture on an OLED is superior to that on a plasma or an LED LCD. But subsequent generations of new high-resolution products rarely are successful only because  of higher quality. There has always been a mitigating convenience or pricing factor that leads to consumer acceptance. Marketing higher-quality has nearly always doomed next-generation products.

Plus, OLED HDTVs for 1920 x 1080p viewing may already be obsolete. Myriad TV makers including LG, Panasonic, Sharp, Sony and Toshiba exhibited advanced 3840 x 2160 pixel 4K HDTVs at both CES and at the IFA show in Berlin in late August. Not that the public is clamoring for 4K, either, but…

Yield, legal and leaking problems

Aside from marketing issues that must be obvious to OLED executives, OLED has suffered manufacturing and legal setbacks.

Not surprisingly for a new display technology, both Samsung and LG are suffering low manufacturing yields, the primary reason behind the delay.

But the two Korean giants have been trading lawsuits over OLED technology as well.

First, Samsung sued LG over OLED patents. LG snapped back with its own patent infringement accusations. Then Samsung slapped a countersuit, asserting LG's patent claims were nonsense.

On top of these ping-pong lawsuits, OLED technology from both companies has reportedly been leaked to Chinese copycat manufacturers, which could result in a flood of cheaper OLED sets.

I'm sure both Samsung and LG will put on the brave faces as they optimistically exhibit the same OLED models they did at IFA. But it's hard to imagine executives promoting the same confidence in OLED as they did a year ago.

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Why 'Quality' Content May Not Save the Traditional Pay TV Industry

Monday December 3, 2012 - Greg Scoblete

While the pay TV industry has appeared to have side-stepped the threat from "cord cutters" there's a new threat looming on the horizon: "cord nevers."

Speaking at a conference on media at the Paley Center, Time Warner Cable CEO Jeff Bewkes said that while the pay TV industry was not threatened by the likes of Netflix or Amazon poaching away existing subscribers, it did face a challenge from young customers who grew up in a world of Netflix and YouTube and may not seek out a traditional pay TV package when (if) they move out into the world. These are the "cord nevers."

But Bewkes, making the case for traditional pay TV, made an interesting statement, as relayed by reporter Jeff John Roberts:

For them [cord nevers], he said it’s not a question of money — “they can afford three Starbucks a day” — but rather different habits and expectations. Bewkes pointed out that the “cord nevers” are not receiving the best content ...[emphasis added]

The implication is that once confronted with "the best content" these cord nevers will see the light and pay up.

Maybe, or maybe not.

In fact, there's good reason to believe that Bewkes may be wrong about the quality vs. convenience argument. Just look what happened in the music/audio equipment business. When the MP3 file was born, purists turned their nose up at compressed audio. I recall many an argument from consumer electronics firms pooh-poohing the lousy audio quality and insisting that people would quickly tire of listening to music through crumby PC speakers or earbuds. Out of this conviction the DVD Audio and Super Audio CD formats were born.

We all know how that story ended.

Or take compact digital cameras. While smartphone photography has vastly improved relative to where it was three or four years ago, it's still woefully deficient next to an inexpensive point-and-shoot camera. Yet the point-and-shoot category is suffering in large part thanks to smartphones.

In both cases, convenience and cost trumped quality.

This matters because, to date, while traditional pay TV firms have a relatively strong hold on "quality" (i.e. content that the vast majority of video consumers want) they are failing on both convenience and cost. Take "TV Everywhere." As Peter Kafka observed, the promise of pay TV access across a range of devices isn't being realized by the traditional pay TV providers. Netflix or Amazon Instant Video subscribers, however, have no such problem and deliver their services at a fraction of the cost.

Chances are most "cord nevers" will tie themselves up with a traditional pay TV provider - particularly if they're sports fan and (more importantly) once the economy improves and they get jobs. Still, until pay TV providers shore up their convenience and cost propositions, they'll remain vulnerable to "cord nevers."

Monday, November 26, 2012

The Fading Picture of Digital Imaging

Monday November 26, 2012 – Stewart Wolpin

A couple of weeks ago, CEA's statistic dynamic duo, Steve Koenig and Shawn DuBravac, presented their annual holiday sales forecast for the U.S. market. Not surprisingly, the pair predicted tablets would be the top holiday technology gifts for the second year in a row.

What was more surprising was the pair's pessimistic forecast for digital cameras and especially camcorders.

DTC has already forecasted severe downturn in sales, but the CEA statistical duo noted 2012 U.S. holiday sales for digital cameras would drop 7.6 percent, and a massive 51 percent fall off for camcorders.




These precipitous sales forecasts are far worse than CEA's mid-year forecast. In July, just four months ago, CEA projected sales of digital cameras would be flat for 2012 compared to last year, and camcorders would fall "only" 24 percent compared to 2011.

Even as digital cameras, and especially smartphones, get better and better at recording video, the camcorder market looks unsalvageable, likely to settle into a low volume/high profit high-end product niche similar to digital SLRs or high-end audio.

But, apropos to the season, digital cameras may be resurrected thanks to its mortal enemy, the smartphone.

Snapshot savior?

The same week Steve and Shawn presented their digital imaging projections, Samsung officially started selling a potential digital imaging game-changer: its smartphone-like Galaxy Camera.

Three functions make a smartphone a more desirable digital camera to most consumers:

• ubiquitousness; you always have it

• Internet connectivity to instantly share and post snapshots

• a powerful processor to improve speed and image quality

• it does a lot more than take photos

Essentially a smartphone/digital camera hybrid, the Galaxy Camera answers two of these desires. The Galaxy Camera runs the latest Android operating system (4.1 Jelly Bean), features a 4.8-inch screen with a 1.4 quad core processor, and provides 3G/4G connectivity for photo sharing. You may not always have it, but the Galaxy Camera has a smartphone's picture processing power, connectivity to share, and because it runs Android Jelly Bean is actually a small (albeit fat) tablet.

We'll soon know whether or not the Galaxy Camera connects with consumers, who still may not want to carry two imaging devices or pay for additional cellular connectivity, regardless of the second device's capabilities.

Who else wants to play?

More importantly, it's hard to know if the Galaxy Camera can be imitated.

Building an Android camera is certainly doable – Android is an open OS designed by Google to let anyone play.

But is it possible for another camera maker to successfully make one?

One problem for other potential Android camera makers is lack of Android experience. Only one other leading camera maker – Sony – also makes smartphones and PCs and, therefore, has any experience with an operating system.

To create an Android camera of their own, other leading digicam vendors such as Canon, Nikon and Fuji would be forced to wander around an unfamiliar technology neighborhood. The success of the Samsung Galaxy Camera may force them to; its failure may be a relief to an industry ready to concentrate instead on higher-margin compact system models.

Everyone else's lack of Android inexperience is good news in the short term for Samsung – it'll likely have the Android camera market to itself for a bit. But a lack of other Android cameras could be bad news for the digital camera industry in the long run as consumers continue to flock to that other OS-centric device in their pocket to snap snapshots.

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

MPEG Efficiency: The evolution will be mobile

Monday November 19, 2012 – Maya Jasmin

With the advent of the next generation of high definition video compression technology on the visible horizon, it looks as if it will be taking a much different path to video dominance than what has been traversed in the past. Instead of the traditional digital TV world, High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) will likely be ushered in by the internet and wireless parts of the video world. While Ultra HD is a definite allure of HEVC for large screen displays, it’s the increase in compression efficiency that is attracting carriers and providers in the cellular and internet world. As the first compression technology to make efficient use of mobile networks, MPEG-4 AVC has already began paving the way for HEVC dominance in the mobile device world.

With consumers increasing mobile device use for video consumption and the large number of devices on the market that support MPEG-4 AVC, mobile providers are working hard to make the most of  available bandwidth. DTC expects over 700 million MPEG-4 AVC mobile phones and tablets to ship in 2013, climbing to over a billion units shipped in 2015 (MPEG-4 AVC Forecast report). Now that MPEG-4 AVC is thoroughly entrenched in these product categories, the market is ripe for the next-generation of MPEG compression to make a major splash in the digital video world. While tablets are a much younger and dynamic product category, both phones and tablets are growing rapidly and are estimated to yield double digit year-over-year growth over the next five years. The explosive growth of VOD delivered over the internet to computers and mobile devices is driving a move toward greater efficiency gains in compression. Now that MPEG-4 AVC is fueling this online video consumption, the industry is ready for the next video-compression evolution.


Monday, November 12, 2012

Why Pay TV Video on Demand Is Underperforming

Monday November 12, 2012 – Greg Scoblete 

For the past two years, DTC has noted a slower pace of growth in video on demand (VOD) title sales among pay TV providers. It's still growing globally, thanks in part to an overall rise in pay TV subscribers, but the growth rates could be better. The cause of this sluggish pace is fairly well known: alternatives such as Netflix are taking their toll. But based on my own recent experience, we can add another: lousy marketing.

For five years, I’ve been satisfying my VOD fix with Amazon’s Instant Video (accessed via my TiVo). My version of Amazon's Internet VOD isn’t all that "instant" – the Series 2 TiVo doesn’t support streaming, instead, videos are downloaded to the hard drive. This causes anywhere between a 30 minute to two hour wait, depending on network traffic and other variables. That's typically not a problem for the adults in the house, but it does become a hassle when trying to quickly pacify the children.

Then, by sheer accident, the family discovered that Cablevision, my cable TV provider, offered its own VOD service. (You would think someone who spends an inordinate amount of time in the pay TV world would be intimately familiar with his own local offerings, but then you haven’t heard the one about the shoemaker’s children…). As a basic cable subscriber, I thought VOD was either out-of-reach or too cumbersome to order (anything involving a phone call is a no-no). But lo and behold we found a modest selection of movie titles for instant viewing. Not a lot, but enough for our casual needs.

Videos, particularly new releases, cost about $1 more through Cablevision than through Amazon but despite my penchant for thrift, I'd gladly eat it (I think of it as a 'convenience premium').

The net result of this discovery has been anywhere from a $4 to $10 monthly shift of rental cash from Amazon to Cablevision.

The only conclusion to be drawn from this sample size of one is that Cablevision missed the boat, big time: I've been a cable subscriber for five years and don't recall a single piece of advertising - online, on TV or in print - that promoted this service. All that time, Amazon was capturing my VOD dollar (and not making a profit, amazingly).

There's good reason to believe I'm not alone. Several consumer surveys have noted a serious lack of awareness of pay TV VOD offerings. The industry has even fumbled the more lucrative theatrical release market, where a film is available simultaneously in theaters and via VOD. According to survey by the studio Lions Gate, almost 90 percent of movie goers had no idea that the recent movie Arbitrage was available for viewing on demand on the same day as the theatrical release.

Clearly, more needs to be done to get the word out or Netflix, Amazon et al. will continue to eat the pay TV provider's lunch. Globally, Netflix in particular has been pushing into new markets. If pay TV providers in Europe and Latin America and other markets targeted by Internet VOD players want to retain their VOD revenue, they'd do well to learn from the failures of their North American counterparts. Or suffer their fate.

Monday, November 5, 2012

Colombia: There is No Risk in Staying

Monday November 5, 2012 – Stewart Wolpin

While watching the History Channel mini-series, "The Men Who Built America," I am reminded of how much willpower is exerted to create something out of nothing, or to transform something that doesn't work into something that does to transform society.

One of my tech compatriots with ties to the digital TV business, whom I amazingly bumped into at Bogota's Casa Vieja restaurant during lunch last week, agrees that "the transition in Colombia is exciting." We and many observers believe a decade from now, Colombia could take its place as a major software development center in the Western Hemisphere.

Over the past decade, Colombia's and Bogota's governments have been working on two fronts:

One, pushing out both the physical presence of and the lingering perception of narco-trafficking. According to government officials, the drug trade has been dismantled in the same way the Mafia has been defanged in the U.S., and is gone from Medellin and Cali, relegated to smaller towns. Both homicide and kidnapping rates are below that of most U.S. cities and not even a concern anymore. Colombia addresses its no longer relevant violent reputation in its tourism slogan, "The Only Risk is Wanting to Stay."

Two, building out the country's human, trade, physical and digital infrastructure, efforts aimed at creating an IT and software export industry unparalleled outside of the U.S.

On the human side, university graduations have doubled in the last decade, during which there have been 1.8 million engineering degrees awarded in a population of 49 million. I visited software and videogame developers around Bogota doing Web-development and IT programming work for major American companies including Coca-Cola, American Express, Sears, Target, Wal-Mart, Travelocity and others. Because of its similar time zones (Bogota is on Central Time), U.S. companies are "near-shoring," especially call centers.

TRADE AND DIGITAL BUILD OUT

On the trade front, Colombia signed a free trade agreement with the U.S. last year as in the process of reaching similar deals with Europe and Asia, and has set up more than 100 free trade zones with 15 percent tax rates around the country. Bogota is about to start work on a 7,000-square-meter technology corridor. Colombia also offers funds to help companies acclimate and train employees, the tech-centric SENA (National Apprenticeship System), and INNpulsa.

Regarding digital infrastructure, the number of Colombian towns with access to broadband connections has more than quintupled in just two years thanks to a rapid fiber optic build-out. Digital TV has seen similar expansion.

According to my compatriot:

"From the perspective of video service operators (cable/sat), I'd say Colombia is in similar position to that of Argentina, slightly behind Chile, but far behind Brazil. Digital cable penetration in Colombia is under 50 percent (vs. almost 90 percent in Brazil, for example). However, going forward, new STBs for Colombia will focus not on basic STBs (i.e. standard definition, one-way), but rather on HD boxes with integrated DOCSIS modems to enable deployment of relatively advanced features (DVR, HD, VOD)."

Colombia also is about to drop the hammer on a 4G wireless spectrum auction, open to foreign bidders, from which the government hopes to yield US$480,000. Mobile phone penetration has zoomed from just 5.3 percent to 101.3 percent in the last decade, with a quarter of subscribers already using smartphones; anecdotally, I saw few smartphones that weren't iPhones.

HARDWARE AND TRANSPORTATION

On the consumer electronics front, the country's primary big box retailer, the 13-store chain K-Tronix, stocks most of the major brands found in U.S. retailers.

But prices on TVs, Blu-ray players, PCs and other CE hardware are around 25-30 percent higher than in the U.S. A 16 GB iPad 3, for instance, listed at $667, compared to just $499 in the U.S.; a 60-inch Panasonic ST50 3D plasma HDTV lists for $2,100, on sale for $1,700, in the U.S. but for $2,750, on sale for $1,911.

In addition to K-Tronix, Samsung, LG, Sony, Bose and Bang & Olufsen all have showrooms stores in varying parts of Bogota.

One way around these higher prices for Bogota residents are two adjacent tech malls, Unilago and Centro de Alta Tecnologia (Center for High Technology). Combined, these two three-story rabbit warrens pack in more than 600 "stores" – more like 200 to 300-square-foot booths, each specializing on one type of gadget category (i.e. PCs, printers, portable audio, etc.) None of these stores post prices – everything is a negotiation.

These higher prices make these goods further out of reach for most Colombians; while per capita income has doubled in the last decade, it's still a fifth of that as in the U.S.

Another potentially crippling Colombian problem is transportation. With no widespread mass transit, traffic in Bogota is a nightmare and getting worse, not only the number of cars but of buses, but the aggressive way people drive, often on pot hole-filled side and secondary streets that resemble the pock-marked face of a pubescent teen. Motorcycles are enormously popular for their ability to weave in-and-out of normal bumper-to-bumper jams.

Bogota hopes to break ground on a subway system next year with the first lines completed by 2018. The country also is expanding inter-city highways and wants to build rail links to connect cities separated by mountains and from the land-locked Bogota to both Cartagena on the Caribbean coast and Buenaventura on the Pacific – Colombia is the only South American country with access to both the Atlantic and the Pacific.

TALK TO ME

But Colombia's biggest problem in becoming an international player may be in basic communication. Outside of the professional class, not many Colombians are bi-lingual. Few hotel staffers, service workers or taxi drivers speak English.

Both the national and Bogota governments have instituted bi-lingual education and certification to address this obvious need. Individual companies also are pitching in; software developer Globant holds English classes three days a week.

But as a capitalistic country surrounded by socialist entities, Colombia – the second-largest country in South America with the second-largest Spanish-speaking population – is positioning itself as an IT/software/service development center. No matter how it turns out, Colombia's re-building is exciting to watch and worth keeping an eye on.

Monday, October 29, 2012

Google and Motorola: A Match Made in...

Monday October 29, 2012 – Greg Scoblete

When Google purchased Motorola in 2011 it was widely perceived as a defensive maneuver to stock up on the company's intellectual property in the face of Apple's thermo-nuclear patent war against Google's Android operating system.

Google may not have appreciated it at the time, but rather than suiting up with Motorola's IP armor, they appear increasingly weighted down by Motorola's loss-making baggage.

In a financial report that broke earlier than Google had planned, it was revealed that losses from Motorola's mobile division totaled a staggering $505 million for the quarter. Motorola's home division losses were a not-as-horrific $22 million. In short, Motorola is fast turning into a major liability for Google's bottom line.

This has, not surprisingly, led to calls for Google to off-load the struggling company, something Google is reportedly exploring. Google has, to date, maintained an arms-length relationship with Motorola lest they offend their other hardware partners selling Android smartphones, tablets and set-top boxes. Yet there is another avenue open to Google which may promise to right the ship.

In short, they could pull a Microsoft and copy Apple.

Microsoft, like Google, built its empire on software, letting other manufacturers tackle the hardware (the Xbox being a notable, successful, exception). Yet earlier this year, Microsoft broke from this tradition with the introduction of the Surface tablet. Timed with the release of the new Windows 8 operating system, the Surface is a tacit acknowledgement that Apple's approach to hardware and software integration delivered genuine value to consumers. Throw Amazon's Kindle Fire tablet into the mix and it's clear that the new battleground in tech is between software ecosystems (including operating systems, app stores and digital content libraries) that are closely fused with hardware.

Other manufacturers will offer Windows 8 hardware, of course, but Microsoft has realized that to play in this new arena, they needed to stake their own hardware mark. No surprise that there are now persistent rumors that Microsoft will build its own smartphone next.

Indeed, Google has already stepped down this road: they have partnered closely with several manufacturers (Samsung, Asus and now LG) to produce Nexus-branded gear to show off the latest iterations of Android. But Google could do more. They could, in theory, harness Motorola to the same end. Motorola makes all the products necessary to compete in the platform war including set-top boxes, smartphones and tablets. A closer fusion of the two may alienate Google's hardware partners, like Samsung, but where are they going to go? Android is a vastly more popular mobile platform than Windows and unless Windows 8 is a smash hit, manufacturers will need to offer Android tablets and smartphones to stay in the mobile market.

Moreover, with the introduction of Google Fiber and the company's continued push into the TV space, leveraging Motorola's set-top box experience and pay TV provider relationships gives Google a strategic advantage that neither Apple nor Microsoft enjoy.

Will Google do it? Probably not, but in a tech world that is increasing embracing Apple's model, it's interesting to note that it's now Google that's "thinking different." And paying a price.

Monday, October 22, 2012

Digital Radio Is Rising

Monday October 22, 2012 – Jing Sui

The latest improvements for digital radio are allowing traditional broadcasters to marry broadcast signals with ever-growing popular Internet radio offerings, as well as carve out new business models for established broadcast transmissions.  Today, there are four main digital radio systems: the European Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) system, Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM), Japanese ISDB-T, and U.S. HD Radio. DTC’s latest forecast shows 12.5 million digital radios shipping worldwide in 2012 and estimates a 32% increase in shipments between now and 2017, to 16.5 million units. 

The latest frontier of digital radio is proving to be in consumer automobiles. In the U.S., a wide array of leading automakers: Acura, Audi, Bentley, BMW, Buick, Cadillac, and among others have included HD Radio in their new models’ dashboards. In additional to the original features that HD Radio established (such as display album art and other images), more advanced features like iTunes tagging, Artist Experience and Digital Traffic and Data are now included as standard features.  In Europe and Australia, DAB/DAB+ in-car radio receiver is also becoming common.

Hybrid radio, which allows consumers to load apps onto mobile devices to let broadcast radio and the internet work together, is also getting people’s attention. Without additional costs, this marriage of radio and internet allows radio listeners access to broadcast radio programs by streaming audio via smartphone and tablet devices. But more importantly, the new concept adds new features such as on-screen programming guides and the ability for broadcasters to insert additional ads to be viewed on a smartphone or tablet screen. However, challenges still exist as streaming audio may not be the most efficient way to reach listeners.  But in today’s market where few mobile devices include broadcast radio receivers, streaming over the internet is the best way to reach listeners who are on the go. 

DAB Countries*
DRM Countries*
ISDB-T Countries*
HD Radio Countries*
Australia
Austria
Japan
U.S.
Belgium
France

Mexico
China
Germany


Czech Republic
India


Denmark
Australia


Germany
Canada


Hong Kong
UK


Malta



The Netherlands



Norway



South Korea



Sweden



Switzerland



UK



*Systems that have already been adopted (excluding those under testing or on trials)